Objectification literally means to present as an object. Its
modern connotation is to make someone an object of lust and sexual desires
rather than as a human being. Objectification of this kind is prevalent today
in marketing and media.
One of the earliest commercials I can remember that has an
example of sexual objectification in order to sell a product is Carl’s Jr. They
have a beautiful woman dressed scantily, often in a bikini, eating one of their
sloppy burgers and a man looking on with his mouth watering. This commercial
was an example of objectification of women. It is one of many commercials and
marketing schemes like it. Women are frequent targets of these commercials.
Men are also objectified in commercials directed towards
women. An example of that is a recent commercial for Kraft Zesty Italian Salad
Dressing. A rugged man is cooking in the kitchen and in the end of the
commercial his shirt is burned off to reveal a chiseled upper frame. This
commercial is aimed at women, but it is still nonetheless sexual
objectification in the media.
Sexual objectification is well known as Abercrombie
and Fitch’s marketing strategy. From shirtless men, without their faces and
heads on the shopping bags, to large photographs of barely clothed couples passionately
kissing. It seems that A&F is not really selling clothes at all but is
selling sex. It makes the models in their pictures as objects, whose only
purpose is to play on the animalistic and lustful side of men and women to come
to the store and buy their clothes.
The question isn’t really what is objectification or
does it exist? It most assuredly does, but is it ethical? Does it negatively
affect society and individuals?
On a moral standpoint, many would argue that sexual
objectification is morally wrong and is objectionable. It denigrates the human
body and the individual and promotes promiscuous behaviors. But is it more than
that? Does objectification in the media increase domestic violence because
husbands view their wives as little more than an object to fulfill selfish
desires and appetites? Does objectification cause men and women to feel
devalued and increase feelings of inferiority?
Taylor Buie
of the University of Georgia quotes Tom Reichert in saying “Studies show that
viewing these images can lead to “devaluations of one's— and one's partner's—attractiveness,
attitudes supportive of aggressiveness toward women, triggering of gender
stereotyping and gender role expectations, and distorted body image” (Reichert,
A Test 82).”
Julie M.
Stankiewicz says in her article “Women as sex objects and Victims in Print
Advertisement”: “The
simultaneous presentation of women as sex objects and victims in various forms
of media increases acceptance of violence against women.” She goes on to
discuss how this kind of advertising desensitizes both men and women to
violence.
Upon these
grounds, I would advise all of us to avoid supporting companies that use sexual
objectification as a means of advertising and that we do not further promote or
purport objectification. These advertisements are a low-blow to make money off of our sexual desires.

It is unfortunate, and I find it morally and ethically objectionable, but sex appeal is also a tried and proven marketing technique. Until sex appeal stops working, it will never disappear as a marketing strategy.
ReplyDeleteIt's true! I have thought about that a lot lately. Especially with people getting after A&F for selling only to skinny people. I think people have to realize that morals and ethics don't always go with advertising and business. However, we as a general public and consumers are entitled to make conscientious decisions and support the business practices that we find to be right, and the ones that appeal to us.
ReplyDelete